$150,000 in Los Angeles ≈ £126,648 in London
Los Angeles vs London: cost of living, compared
Equivalence is solved so household net cash matches across both cities, with taxes, housing, childcare, healthcare, food, and travel all included.
What changes: Los Angeles → London
- ▴ 10 more vacation days per year in London (statutory)
- ▴ 11 more paid parental-leave weeks (21 vs 10)
- ▴ Universal healthcare in London (no premium / minimal OOP)
- ▾ Income + payroll tax runs 31.1% in London vs 26.9% in Los Angeles
- ▾ Housing runs about 12% more in London
- ▾ Groceries and dining runs about 12% more in London
The headline math
| Los Angeles household gross | $150,000 |
| Los Angeles taxes (26.9%) | −$40,287 |
| Los Angeles living costs | −$63,788 |
| Los Angeles net cash | $45,925 |
| ≈ | |
| London household gross needed | £126,648($169,542) |
| London taxes (31.1%) | −£39,443 |
| London living costs | −£52,898 |
| London net cash | £34,307 |
Computed at the city-median tech-worker salary, Los Angeles (typical professional) · effective tax rates: 26.9% vs 31.1%
The bottom line
- →$150,000 in Los Angeles leaves about the same net cash as £126,648 in London for this scenario, after real taxes and living costs.
- →Taxes take 26.9% of gross in Los Angeles versus 31.1% in London.
- →The biggest non-cash swing: 10 more vacation days per year in London (statutory).
These numbers use one scenario's assumptions. Plug in your own salary, family size, and lifestyle.
Open the interactive calculator to run your own →No signup. Your salary stays in your browser — we never see it.
Moving from Los Angeles to London
$150,000 in Los Angeles is worth £126,648 in London on a household net-cash basis. That is the equivalence figure this tool solves for: the London gross salary whose take-home, after taxes and local costs, lands in the same place as your Los Angeles take-home. Most people are surprised by how large the number is. Most of the gap is taxes.
The effective tax rate goes from 26.9% in Los Angeles to 31.1% in London. That 4.3-point jump is what the equivalence solver is working against when it finds the matching gross salary.
Healthcare in London is universal. Los Angeles households pay $3,465 in premiums and out-of-pocket costs per year, and that spending disappears in London. It won't show up in a take-home comparison, but it's real money.
London workers get 25 vacation days per year. Los Angeles averages 15. That 10-day gap does not appear in any salary comparison, but at a typical professional's daily rate it represents thousands of dollars of time that stays in your life rather than being bought back by your employer.
Living costs (housing, food, transit, discretionary) total $60,048 in Los Angeles and £51,388 in London at these scenario defaults. The breakdown table shows each line item separately, with source citations and last-updated dates available on hover.
Understand what's behind these numbers
Common questions
How much do you need to earn in London to match a $150,000 salary in Los Angeles?
About £126,648. cityparity solves for the London gross salary whose net cash (after taxes, housing, childcare, healthcare, and the rest) equals what you keep in Los Angeles. It's an equivalence, not a raw conversion.
Is healthcare free in London?
London has universal healthcare, so there are no US-style premiums or large deductibles. cityparity counts that as real money you don't spend, which is part of why the equivalent salary is lower than the raw number suggests.
How much vacation and parental leave do you get in London?
London has about 33 paid days off a year (vacation plus public holidays) and 52 weeks of parental leave. cityparity surfaces these as deltas rather than dollars, because time off is part of the real comparison.
Run your own numbers in the interactive calculator →