cityparity

$225,000 in New York City ≈ €192,225 in Lisbon

Software engineer pay: New York City vs Lisbon

Equivalence is solved so household net cash matches across both cities, with taxes, housing, childcare, healthcare, food, and travel all included.

What changes: New York City → Lisbon

  • 7 more vacation days per year in Lisbon (statutory)
  • 9 more paid parental-leave weeks (17 vs 8)
  • Universal healthcare in Lisbon (no premium / minimal OOP)

The headline math

New York City household gross $225,000
New York City taxes (30.8%) −$69,316
New York City living costs −$80,715
New York City net cash $74,969
Lisbon household gross needed €192,225
Lisbon taxes (45.3%) −€87,122
Lisbon living costs −€36,133
Lisbon net cash €68,970

Computed at the city-median tech-worker salary, New York City (a senior software engineer) · effective tax rates: 30.8% vs 45.3%

These numbers use one scenario's assumptions. Plug in your own salary, family size, and lifestyle.

Open the interactive calculator to run your own →

Moving from New York City to Lisbon for a software engineer

$225,000 in New York City requires €192,225 in Lisbon to match on household net cash. The gap is real, but it is smaller than the nominal numbers suggest once taxes run their course. Progressive brackets compress the after-tax difference faster than a compensation benchmarking site would lead you to believe, because those sites show gross and stop there.

The effective tax rate goes from 30.8% in New York City to 45.3% in Lisbon. That 14.5-point jump is what the equivalence solver is working against when it finds the matching gross salary.

Unvested equity changes this calculation entirely. RSU value is not modeled in the defaults above, but if you are mid-cycle at your current employer, leaving means forfeiting grants you have already been working toward, and that difference can be larger than the annual take-home delta that drove the comparison in the first place. The Advanced section's "RSU / stock annual value" field is where you plug that number in. Equity-heavy comp favors lower-tax cities at vesting; the after-tax discount gets larger the bigger the grant.

Healthcare in Lisbon is universal. New York City households pay $3,705 in premiums and out-of-pocket costs per year. That spending disappears in Lisbon. It won't appear in a take-home comparison, but it is real money.

Lisbon engineers get 22 vacation days per year. New York City averages 15. That 7-day gap is real money at a senior IC's daily rate, and it does not show up on the offer letter.

No kids, employer healthcare, and a single high-bracket income: this is the configuration that makes New York City look best in a head-to-head comparison. It is also the configuration most likely to change. The family scenario page (linked below) models what shifts once childcare and a second earner enter the picture.

Common questions

How much do you need to earn in Lisbon to match a $225,000 salary in New York City?

About €192,225. cityparity solves for the Lisbon gross salary whose net cash (after taxes, housing, childcare, healthcare, and the rest) equals what you keep in New York City. It's an equivalence, not a raw conversion.

Is healthcare free in Lisbon?

Lisbon has universal healthcare, so there are no US-style premiums or large deductibles. cityparity counts that as real money you don't spend, which is part of why the equivalent salary is lower than the raw number suggests.

How much vacation and parental leave do you get in Lisbon?

Lisbon has about 35 paid days off a year (vacation plus public holidays) and 17 weeks of parental leave. cityparity surfaces these as deltas rather than dollars, because time off is part of the real comparison.

Run your own numbers in the interactive calculator →

Related comparisons

Every figure here comes from the same engine as the interactive calculator: real progressive tax brackets, city-median costs, childcare net of government allowances, and the social safety net priced in. Sources are cited per row in the calculator, refreshed annually. Read the full methodology →