Employer cost by country: what your salary costs before you see any of it
By Skyler Bissell · Updated August 2026 · 34 city rows across 31 countries · employer schedules verified 2026-08-25
Employer cost is your gross salary plus every mandatory contribution your employer pays on top of it, and in Tallinn it runs 33.8% of gross. An Estonian employer writes a cheque for about EUR 173,940 to put EUR 130,000 on your contract. A Texas employer adds 7.8%. A Danish employer adds 1.1%, and Denmark runs a full welfare state anyway, because it collects the money through income tax instead.
That is why one country can look cheap on a payslip and expensive on a payroll. Below are 34 city rows across 31 countries, each showing the state's cut measured two ways: against the salary on your contract, and against what your employment costs the company. Move the controls and both columns recompute in your browser from the same engine that runs the calculator.
Basis: $150,000 salary equivalent, single filer, 0% retirement deferral, no expat regime.
The two rates use different denominators on purpose. The left one divides by contract gross, the right one by employer cost, so the difference between them is partly a denominator effect and not a second tax.
Employer schedules are sourced at the $150,000 basis. About half of them are capped, and a cap is a fact about one salary, so the salary control applies to the contract view.
Controls need JavaScript. The table below is the $150,000 single-filer view either way.
-
Brussels Belgium49.960.2
-
Milan Italy44.556.8
-
Helsinki Finland48.056.6
-
Lisbon Portugal45.656.5
-
Paris France38.356.5
-
Stockholm Sweden37.252.3
-
Berlin Germany43.350.9
-
Vienna Austria39.150.4
-
Warsaw Poland41.648.1
-
Madrid Spain39.647.8
-
Amsterdam Netherlands41.647.0
-
Dublin Ireland39.345.5
-
Prague Czechia28.343.9
-
Oslo Norway34.843.0
-
Bucharest Romania41.542.8
-
Tallinn Estonia23.442.7
-
London United Kingdom34.542.7
-
Tel Aviv Israel38.642.6
-
Montreal Canada39.642.5
-
Tokyo Japan36.841.7
-
Budapest Hungary33.541.2
-
Copenhagen Denmark39.840.5
-
Toronto Canada35.937.8
-
Seoul South Korea32.036.8
-
Vancouver Canada33.335.3
-
Geneva Switzerland27.433.7
-
Bangalore India32.332.4
-
Sydney Australia31.031.1
-
Austin USA24.129.7
-
Zurich Switzerland23.228.9
-
Taipei Taiwan19.723.7
-
Singapore20.220.2
-
Hong Kong15.115.5
-
Dubai UAE0.00.0
0%20%40%60%
| City | Country | Employer adds (% of gross) | Tax on the contract | Tax on employer cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brussels | Belgium | 25.7% | 49.9% | 60.2% |
| Milan | Italy | 28.6% | 44.5% | 56.8% |
| Helsinki | Finland | 19.9% | 48.0% | 56.6% |
| Lisbon | Portugal | 25.0% | 45.6% | 56.5% |
| Paris | France | 41.7% | 38.3% | 56.5% |
| Stockholm | Sweden | 31.4% | 37.2% | 52.3% |
| Berlin | Germany | 15.5% | 43.3% | 50.9% |
| Vienna | Austria | 22.9% | 39.1% | 50.4% |
| Warsaw | Poland | 12.4% | 41.6% | 48.1% |
| Madrid | Spain | 15.7% | 39.6% | 47.8% |
| Amsterdam | Netherlands | 10.1% | 41.6% | 47.0% |
| Dublin | Ireland | 11.3% | 39.3% | 45.5% |
| Prague | Czechia | 27.9% | 28.3% | 43.9% |
| Oslo | Norway | 14.4% | 34.8% | 43.0% |
| Bucharest | Romania | 2.3% | 41.5% | 42.8% |
| Tallinn | Estonia | 33.8% | 23.4% | 42.7% |
| London | United Kingdom | 14.3% | 34.5% | 42.7% |
| Tel Aviv | Israel | 7.0% | 38.6% | 42.6% |
| Montreal | Canada | 5.1% | 39.6% | 42.5% |
| Tokyo | Japan | 8.4% | 36.8% | 41.7% |
| Budapest | Hungary | 13.0% | 33.5% | 41.2% |
| Copenhagen | Denmark | 1.1% | 39.8% | 40.5% |
| Toronto | Canada | 3.1% | 35.9% | 37.8% |
| Seoul | South Korea | 7.7% | 32.0% | 36.8% |
| Vancouver | Canada | 3.1% | 33.3% | 35.3% |
| Geneva | Switzerland | 9.5% | 27.4% | 33.7% |
| Bangalore | India | 0.1% | 32.3% | 32.4% |
| Sydney | Australia | 0.3% | 31.0% | 31.1% |
| Austin | USA | 7.8% | 24.1% | 29.7% |
| Zurich | Switzerland | 8.0% | 23.2% | 28.9% |
| Taipei | Taiwan | 5.2% | 19.7% | 23.7% |
| Singapore | Singapore | 0.1% | 20.2% | 20.2% |
| Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 0.5% | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Dubai | UAE | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Sorted by tax on employer cost. Belgium is the only row over 60. The employer charge shown is a percentage of gross, taken straight from the statutory schedule, so it is the one column on this page that no denominator argument touches.
0%20%40%60%
| City | Country | Gross modeled | Tax on the contract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dubai | UAE | AED 551,000 | 0.0% |
| Hong Kong | Hong Kong | HKD 1,176,000 | 15.1% |
| Taipei | Taiwan | TWD 4,842,000 | 19.7% |
| Singapore | Singapore | SGD 192,000 | 20.2% |
| Zurich | Switzerland | CHF 121,000 | 23.2% |
| Tallinn | Estonia | EUR 130,000 | 23.4% |
| Austin | USA | USD 150,000 | 24.1% |
| Miami | USA | USD 150,000 | 24.1% |
| Seattle | USA | USD 150,000 | 25.5% |
| Geneva | Switzerland | CHF 121,000 | 27.4% |
| Prague | Czechia | CZK 3,149,000 | 28.3% |
| Denver | USA | USD 150,000 | 28.5% |
| Chicago | USA | USD 150,000 | 28.6% |
| Boston | USA | USD 150,000 | 29.1% |
| Sydney | Australia | AUD 213,000 | 31.0% |
| San Francisco | USA | USD 150,000 | 31.4% |
| Los Angeles | USA | USD 150,000 | 31.4% |
| Seoul | South Korea | KRW 216,080,000 | 32.0% |
| Bangalore | India | INR 14,322,000 | 32.3% |
| New York City | USA | USD 150,000 | 33.2% |
| Vancouver | Canada | CAD 210,000 | 33.3% |
| Budapest | Hungary | HUF 47,297,000 | 33.5% |
| London | United Kingdom | GBP 111,000 | 34.5% |
| Oslo | Norway | NOK 1,424,000 | 34.8% |
| Toronto | Canada | CAD 210,000 | 35.9% |
| Tokyo | Japan | JPY 23,703,000 | 36.8% |
| Stockholm | Sweden | SEK 1,427,000 | 37.2% |
| Paris | France | EUR 130,000 | 38.3% |
| Tel Aviv | Israel | ILS 458,000 | 38.6% |
| Vienna | Austria | EUR 130,000 | 39.1% |
| Dublin | Ireland | EUR 130,000 | 39.3% |
| Madrid | Spain | EUR 130,000 | 39.6% |
| Montreal | Canada | CAD 210,000 | 39.6% |
| Copenhagen | Denmark | DKK 971,000 | 39.8% |
| Bucharest | Romania | RON 684,000 | 41.5% |
| Barcelona | Spain | EUR 130,000 | 41.5% |
| Warsaw | Poland | PLN 561,000 | 41.6% |
| Amsterdam | Netherlands | EUR 130,000 | 41.6% |
| Berlin | Germany | EUR 130,000 | 43.3% |
| Munich | Germany | EUR 130,000 | 43.3% |
| Milan | Italy | EUR 130,000 | 44.5% |
| Lisbon | Portugal | EUR 130,000 | 45.6% |
| Helsinki | Finland | EUR 130,000 | 48.0% |
| Brussels | Belgium | EUR 130,000 | 49.9% |
Income tax plus employee payroll contributions, as a share of contract gross. The nine US metros here span 24.1% to 33.2%, which is wider than the gap between Norway and Denmark.
What is missing. Employer schedules exist here for 31 countries, the ones sourced in 2026-08. Spain, Poland, Ireland, Israel, Japan and Hungary are all in the table; Slovakia, Greece and most of Latin America are not, because no employer research covers them yet. The contract view reaches 44 cities. The calculator behind both covers 178: run any two of them.
Where these numbers come from
The contract side is computed, not looked up. Each city's salary goes through its own brackets, thresholds and employee contributions in the engine behind the calculator, at the local gross printed in the table. The employer side is transcribed from 31 statutory schedules read at source: URSSAF for France, HMRC for the UK, Deutsche Rentenversicherung / GKV-Spitzenverband for Germany, IRS Publication 15 and the Texas Workforce Commission for Austin. Every row expands below to its components and its authority.
Seven rules decide what counts. Statutory charges only, so Sweden's collectively bargained ITP is out and France's AGIRC-ARRCO, which the law makes compulsory, is in. Work-accident cover uses the published office-class rate. Charges that only bite above an employer-size threshold are out, since a single-employee scenario cannot assert a payroll. Where the reading was arguable we took the higher employer cost.
The seventh rule is the one that moves rows the furthest. A mandatory charge landing in the employee's own named account is a different animal from a charge landing in the treasury, so Singapore's 17% CPF, Australia's 12% superannuation, Hong Kong's MPF, India's EPF match and the UAE gratuity are all excluded from the employer total and named in the row instead. Those four rows sit near zero on this page for that reason alone, and the money is real.
All 34 employer schedules, with components and sources
Brussels, Belgium: 25.7% of gross, EUR 33,438 on EUR 130,000
ONSS global basic 25.00% (19.88 base plus 5.12 wage moderation) on full gross, UNCAPPED, since no plafond exists in Belgian social security. Plus FFE 0.34%, FFE special 0.10%, asbestos 0.01%, risk groups 0.10%, special AT 0.02%, and a mandatory private work-accident policy.
Also excluded: white-collar double holiday pay, about EUR 9,970: a mandatory wage cost rather than a contribution; the annual-vacation contribution, which is blue-collar only.
ONSS / RSZ, 2026/2 instructions · confidence high
Milan, Italy: 28.6% of gross, EUR 37,139 on EUR 130,000
IVS 23.81% capped at the massimale EUR 122,295 (post-1995 entrant), minor contributions 5.77% uncapped (NASpI, CUAF, CIGS, Fondo garanzia TFR, malattia, maternita, on the large-firm CIGS variant), INAIL office class 0.40%.
Left out under the own-account rule: TFR, about 6.91%: deferred wages owed to the employee.
Also excluded: a pre-1996 entrant has no massimale and would run about 30.0%.
INPS, Circolare 6/2026 · confidence high
Helsinki, Finland: 19.9% of gross, EUR 25,857 on EUR 130,000
TyEL employer 17.10% (the 24.40% average less the 7.30% employee share), unemployment lower tier 0.31%, health 1.91%, accident average 0.51%, group life 0.06%. All uncapped.
Also excluded: the upper-tier unemployment rate of 1.23% applies above a payroll threshold this scenario cannot assert; an all-high reading would run 21.5%.
Finnish Centre for Pensions (ETK) · confidence high
Lisbon, Portugal: 25.0% of gross, EUR 32,468 on EUR 130,000
TSU 23.75% uncapped, charged on the 13th and 14th months too, plus a work-accident office policy at 1.0% with stamp duty and INEM on the premium, plus FAT 0.15%. FCT and FGCT ceased for 2026.
Also excluded: training and occupational-medicine duties: real costs, not contributions.
Caveat: the work-accident rate carries judgment latitude; a 0.5% policy would give 24.4% instead of 25.0%.
Codigo dos Regimes Contributivos, art. 53 (global contribution rate) · confidence high
Paris, France: 41.7% of gross, EUR 54,217 on EUR 130,000
maladie 13%, CSA 0.3%, vieillesse plafonnee 8.55% to 1 PASS and deplafonnee 2.11%, allocations familiales 5.25%, chomage 4.00%, AGS 0.25%, FNAL, AT/MP bureau class 0.70%, AGIRC-ARRCO T1 4.72% and T2 12.95%, CEG, CET, APEC, plus the formation 0.55% and apprentissage 0.68% payroll taxes. PASS 2026 is EUR 48,060, so this gross is 2.70 PASS.
Also excluded: cadre prevoyance 1.5% T1 and the employer half of the mutuelle: insurer-paid benefit premiums, not contributions; large-employer additions (FNAL 0.5% uncapped, formation 1%, versement mobilite Paris 3.20%, roughly 4pp more): the conservative call here is the small-employer set.
URSSAF · confidence high
Stockholm, Sweden: 31.4% of gross, SEK 448,363 on SEK 1,427,000
arbetsgivaravgifter 31.42% for 2026, UNCAPPED, at the full rate for anyone born 1959 or later. The component mix changed for 2026; the total did not.
Also excluded: ITP1, TGL and TFA: collectively bargained rather than statutory. ITP1 alone would add roughly SEK 260,000 to 270,000 at this salary..
Skatteverket · confidence high
Berlin, Germany: 15.5% of gross, EUR 20,122 on EUR 130,000
employer halves at the 2026 ceilings: pension 9.3% and unemployment 1.3% capped at the BBG of EUR 101,400; health 7.3% plus half the 2.9% average Zusatzbeitrag and care 1.8% capped at EUR 69,750; U2 0.44% and U3 0.15% to the pension BBG; DGUV accident at the published cross-industry average of 1.09% on full gross. The marginal employer rate at this gross is ZERO on every statutory branch; only the DGUV average rides the top.
Also excluded: U1: mandatory only at 30 or fewer employees.
Caveat: the U2 rate varies 0.20 to 0.69% by Kasse and the DGUV figure is a cross-industry average rather than a sector rate.
Deutsche Rentenversicherung / GKV-Spitzenverband · confidence high
Vienna, Austria: 22.9% of gross, EUR 29,769 on EUR 130,000
social insurance on a base capped at EUR 96,990 (the 14-payment Hoechstbeitragsgrundlage): pension 12.55%, health 3.78%, accident 1.10%, unemployment 2.95%, IESG 0.10%, plus Vienna WBF 0.75%. Uncapped on full gross: DB/FLAF 3.70%, DZ Vienna 0.36%, Kommunalsteuer 3.00%, plus the flat Vienna U-Bahn-Steuer.
Left out under the own-account rule: Abfertigung Neu 1.53% (BMSVG): the funded analogue of Italy's TFR, so it gets the same treatment.
Oesterreichische Gesundheitskasse (OeGK) · confidence high
Warsaw, Poland: 12.4% of gross, PLN 69,625 on PLN 561,000
emerytalne 9.76% and rentowe 6.5% capped at the 30x limit of PLN 282,600; uncapped: wypadkowe 1.67% (the small-employer flat rate, which is the conservative call), Fundusz Pracy plus FS 2.45%, FGSP 0.10%.
Left out under the own-account rule: PPK: the employee can opt out, and it is an own-account scheme either way.
Zaklad Ubezpieczen Spolecznych (ZUS) · confidence high
Madrid, Spain: 15.7% of gross, EUR 20,460 on EUR 130,000
on a base capped at EUR 61,214.40 a year: contingencias comunes 23.6%, desempleo 5.5%, FOGASA 0.2%, formacion 0.6%, MEI employer 0.75%, AT/EP office class 1.5%. Then the cuota de solidaridad on the excess over the cap, at the 2026 stepped employer rates of 0.96, 1.04 and 1.22% by band. Caps bite hard: 32.15pp of nominal rates apply to under half the gross.
BOE, Orden PJC/297/2026 · confidence high
Amsterdam, Netherlands: 10.1% of gross, EUR 13,142 on EUR 130,000
Awf laag 2.74%, Aof laag 6.27%, Wko 0.50%, Whk sector 44 at 0.94%, and the Zvw employer levy 6.10%. Every one of them stops at the maximumpremieloon of EUR 79,409, so the marginal employer cost above that is zero.
Also excluded: no statutory sector pension fund applies to ICT; an Aof hoog plus average Whk employer would run 11.3% instead of 10.1%.
Caveat: the 8% vakantiegeld sits inside the gross figure, not on top of it.
Belastingdienst, percentages inkomensafhankelijke bijdrage Zvw; Staatscourant 2025, 42324 · confidence high
Dublin, Ireland: 11.3% of gross, EUR 14,674 on EUR 130,000
employer PRSI class A1 at 11.25% from January to September 2026 and 11.40% from October to December, uncapped, with the National Training Fund levy inside the headline rate.
Left out under the own-account rule: MyFutureFund auto-enrolment 1.5% on earnings to EUR 80,000, EUR 1,200 at this salary.
Department of Social Protection, PRSI contribution rates SW 14 · confidence high
Prague, Czechia: 27.9% of gross, CZK 879,539 on CZK 3,149,000
social security 24.8% capped at CZK 2,350,416 (48x the average wage), health insurance 9% UNCAPPED since the ceiling was repealed, accident liability 0.42% office class uncapped. The 9.42% uncapped tail keeps charging past the social-security cap.
Czech Social Security Administration (CSSZ) · confidence high
Oslo, Norway: 14.4% of gross, NOK 205,700 on NOK 1,424,000
arbeidsgiveravgift sone I at 14.1% on gross, plus 14.1% on the OTP premium itself, plus a yrkesskade office policy. The extra 5% AGA band was abolished from 2025.
Left out under the own-account rule: OTP employer minimum 2%, about NOK 28,480: it lands in the employee's own pension account.
Also excluded: AFP and finansskatt: sector-specific.
Skatteetaten · confidence high
Bucharest, Romania: 2.3% of gross, RON 15,390 on RON 684,000
contributia asiguratorie pentru munca (CAM) at 2.25% on full gross, uncapped. That is the entire employer side: CAS 25% and CASS 10% moved to the employee in 2018.
Also excluded: the disability fund: only at 50 or more staff.
Codul fiscal, art. 220^3 · confidence high
Tallinn, Estonia: 33.8% of gross, EUR 43,940 on EUR 130,000
sotsiaalmaks 33% uncapped, plus employer unemployment insurance 0.8% uncapped (rate fixed 2025 to 2028). No separate work-accident scheme exists.
Estonian Tax and Customs Board (EMTA) · confidence high
London, United Kingdom: 14.3% of gross, GBP 15,900 on GBP 111,000
Class 1 secondary National Insurance at 15% on earnings above GBP 5,000 a year, with no upper ceiling. Identical in 2025/26 and 2026/27.
Left out under the own-account rule: auto-enrolment employer minimum 3%, about GBP 1,321 band-capped: it goes to the employee's own pension pot and the employee can opt out.
Also excluded: apprenticeship levy 0.5%: only bites on a paybill over GBP 3M, which a single-employee scenario cannot assert.
HMRC · confidence high
Tel Aviv, Israel: 7.0% of gross, ILS 31,952 on ILS 458,000
National Insurance employer leg on a two-tier schedule: 4.51% up to ILS 7,703 a month and 7.60% from there to the ILS 51,910 monthly ceiling, which this salary sits below. There is no employer leg on health insurance.
Left out under the own-account rule: mandatory pension 6.5% and severance 6% (8.33% under section 14), on wage capped at the average wage of ILS 13,769 a month.
Also excluded: keren hishtalmut: not universally mandatory.
Bituach Leumi (National Insurance Institute) · confidence high
Montreal, Canada: 5.1% of gross, CAD 10,615 on CAD 210,000
QPP 6.30% (CAD 4,479) and QPP2 (416), EI at the reduced Quebec rate (1,254), QPIP 0.602% (620), Fonds des services de sante 1.65% uncapped (3,465), CNT 0.06% (62), CNESST unit 65110 at 0.31% on the CAD 103,000 maximum (319).
Also excluded: WSDRF 1%: only above a CAD 2M payroll; the FSS rate rises to 4.26% at a CAD 7.8M payroll, which would take the total to 7.66%.
Caveat: the CNESST unit rate is from the 2025 table.
Revenu Quebec; Retraite Quebec; CNESST · confidence high
Tokyo, Japan: 8.4% of gross, JPY 1,990,619 on JPY 23,703,000
Kyokai Kenpo Tokyo FY2026 health 4.925%, kaigo 0.81% (age 40 or over assumed) and shienkin 0.115% on the JPY 1,390,000 monthly standard-remuneration cap; pension 9.15% and kyoshutsukin 0.36% on the JPY 650,000 cap; employment insurance 0.85%, rosai code 94 at 0.3% and asbestos 0.002% on full gross. The MARGINAL employer rate here is 1.15%.
Also excluded: the disability levy and the Tokyo jigyoshozei: 100 or more staff.
Japan Health Insurance Association (Kyokai Kenpo), Tokyo FY2026 table · confidence high
Budapest, Hungary: 13.0% of gross, HUF 6,148,610 on HUF 47,297,000
szocialis hozzajarulasi ado (szocho) at 13% on full gross, uncapped. That is the whole employer side.
Also excluded: szakkepzesi hozzajarulas: abolished in 2022; rehabilitation contribution: only above 25 staff.
Nemzeti Ado- es Vamhivatal (NAV) · confidence high
Copenhagen, Denmark: 1.1% of gross, DKK 11,182 on DKK 971,000
all flat kroner amounts, salary-invariant: ATP employer DKK 2,376, AUB 2,821, AES including arbejdsskadeafgift 457 (office class), Barsel.dk 2,200, FIB 328, plus a private work-accident policy at about DKK 3,000.
Left out under the own-account rule: ATP is INCLUDED rather than excluded: it is a statutory collective annuity scheme with no individual investment choice, and at about 0.25% of this gross it is immaterial either way.
Caveat: the private work-accident premium is an estimate at the top of the office band, per the conservative rule.
Virk, Samlet Betaling 2026 satser · confidence high
Toronto, Canada: 3.1% of gross, CAD 6,438 on CAD 210,000
CPP (CAD 4,230), CPP2 (416), EI at 1.4x the employee rate (1,572), WSIB Class L at 0.18% on the CAD 121,700 maximum (219).
Also excluded: Ontario Employer Health Tax 1.95%: only above a CAD 1M payroll.
Caveat: WSIB coverage for a tech employer is by application rather than automatic.
Canada Revenue Agency; WSIB Ontario · confidence high
Seoul, South Korea: 7.7% of gross, KRW 16,587,921 on KRW 216,080,000
National Pension 4.75% on the KRW 6,370,000 (January to June) and 6,590,000 (July to December) monthly caps; health 3.595% plus long-term care at 13.14% of it; employment insurance 0.9% plus the 0.25% stability levy at the smallest employer tier; industrial accident class 907 at 0.6% plus commuting 0.06%; wage-claim guarantee 0.09%. The MARGINAL employer rate here is 5.97%.
Left out under the own-account rule: the statutory retirement benefit, 8.33%, about KRW 18.0M: counting it would take the employer side to 16.0%.
Also excluded: asbestos and disability levies: employer-size gated.
National Pension Service; Ministry of Health and Welfare · confidence high
Vancouver, Canada: 3.1% of gross, CAD 6,410 on CAD 210,000
CPP (CAD 4,230), CPP2 (416), EI at 1.4x the employee rate (1,572), WorkSafeBC classification unit 763007 at 0.15% on the CAD 127,500 maximum (191).
Also excluded: BC Employer Health Tax 1.95%: only above a CAD 1.5M payroll.
Canada Revenue Agency; WorkSafeBC · confidence high
Geneva, Switzerland: 9.5% of gross, CHF 11,533 on CHF 121,000
the federal layer of CHF 7,986 (AHV/IV/EO 5.3% uncapped, ALV 1.1% to CHF 148,200, UVG BU office 0.2%), plus Geneva allocations familiales 2.22%, maternity 0.029%, CPE 0.07%, LFP smallest tier 0.082%, and the OCAS administration fee at its 5% ceiling.
Left out under the own-account rule: BVG employer minimum CHF 3,213, about 2.66%: occupational pension in the employee's own vested benefits.
Also excluded: NBU: employee-side.
Caveat: rates are high confidence, the cantonal administration fee medium.
OCAS Geneve · confidence high
Bangalore, India: 0.1% of gross, INR 16,900 on INR 14,322,000
EPS 8.33%, EDLI 0.5% and EPF administration 0.5%, all on the INR 15,000 monthly wage ceiling rather than actual pay, plus the Karnataka Labour Welfare Fund. ESI does not apply above INR 21,000 a month.
Left out under the own-account rule: EPF employer 3.67% on the INR 15,000 ceiling; gratuity 4.81%: a deferred wage.
Caveat: rates are high confidence; the EPS-member case is a medium-confidence assumption.
EPFO · confidence high
Sydney, Australia: 0.3% of gross, AUD 530 on AUD 213,000
icare workers insurance classification 783400 at 0.218% on salary plus super, and the dust diseases levy at 0.004%. FY2026-27 rates.
Left out under the own-account rule: superannuation guarantee 12%, AUD 25,560: counting it would take the employer side to 12.25%.
Also excluded: NSW payroll tax 5.45%: only above a AUD 1.2M payroll.
icare NSW · confidence high
Austin, USA: 7.8% of gross, USD 11,760 on USD 150,000
Social Security 6.2% to the 2026 wage base of USD 184,500, so the cap does not bind here; Medicare 1.45% uncapped; FUTA net 0.6% on the first USD 7,000; Texas SUI new-employer rate 2.7% on the first USD 9,000.
Also excluded: workers compensation: not mandatory for Texas private employers.
Caveat: the Texas SUI new-employer rate is higher than the experienced-employer average, which is the conservative call. Austin is the only US jurisdiction in this dataset: state unemployment rates, state disability levies and workers-comp mandates all differ by state.
IRS Publication 15 (2026); Texas Workforce Commission · confidence high
Zurich, Switzerland: 8.0% of gross, CHF 9,643 on CHF 121,000
AHV/IV/EO 5.3% uncapped, ALV 1.1% to CHF 148,200, UVG BU office class 0.2%, Zurich family allowances 1.025%, plus the SVA administration fee at 3.25% of the AHV contribution.
Left out under the own-account rule: BVG employer minimum CHF 3,213, about 2.66%.
Also excluded: NBU: employee-side.
SVA Zurich · confidence high
Taipei, Taiwan: 5.2% of gross, TWD 253,944 on TWD 4,842,000
labour insurance at 70% of 11.5% and employment insurance at 70% of 1.0% on the TWD 45,800 insured-salary cap; occupational accident on the TWD 72,800 cap; NHI 5.17% x 60% x 1.56 on the TWD 313,000 cap, plus the 2.11% supplementary levy on the TWD 90,500 excess; arrears fund 0.025%. The MARGINAL employer rate here is 2.11%.
Left out under the own-account rule: Labor Pension 6% on the TWD 150,000 grade, TWD 108,000: counting it would take the employer side to 7.5%.
Also excluded: employee welfare fund and the disability quota: employer-size gated.
Bureau of Labor Insurance; National Health Insurance Administration · confidence high
Singapore, Singapore: 0.1% of gross, SGD 135 on SGD 192,000
the Skills Development Levy alone: 0.25% on the first SGD 4,500 of monthly wages, capped at SGD 11.25 a month.
Left out under the own-account rule: CPF employer 17% on ordinary wages capped at SGD 8,000 a month, SGD 16,320, which is 8.5% of this gross.
Also excluded: the foreign worker levy does not apply to a citizen or permanent resident; work injury compensation insurance is not mandatory for non-manual work above SGD 2,600 a month.
CPF Board, Skills Development Levy · confidence high
Hong Kong, Hong Kong: 0.5% of gross, HKD 6,227 on HKD 1,176,000
there is no payroll tax and no treasury levy. The only compulsory employer payment is an Employees' Compensation policy, priced here at a broker office band of 0.5% plus the 5.8% and 0.1% levies on the premium. No statutory rate is published, so a stricter reading of statutory-only would put this row at zero.
Left out under the own-account rule: MPF employer 5% capped at HKD 1,500 a month, about 1.5%.
Caveat: the only estimated total in this dataset. High confidence that no treasury levy exists, low to medium on the insurance number.
Hong Kong Labour Department, employees' compensation insurance · confidence low-medium
Dubai, UAE: 0.0% of gross, AED 0 on AED 551,000
none. There is no statutory employer contribution for a non-GCC national. GPSSA at 15% covers UAE nationals only, and the ILOE unemployment scheme is paid by the employee.
Left out under the own-account rule: end-of-service gratuity, about 5.83%, which is owed to the employee.
Also excluded: DHA health cover is mandatory and employer-borne but carries no published rate, so it is unpriced here; the MOHRE work-permit fee is tiered by employer classification.
GPSSA; UAE Federal Decree-Law 33/2021 · confidence high
What the table cannot tell you
These are statutory rates: what is owed on an employment contract. What a given person or firm ends up paying can differ, through structuring, through regime elections, and through enforcement. Two of the four inbound regimes the calculator models would change these rows a lot, and all of them are switched off here on purpose, because they expire and the salary you live on afterwards is the one worth comparing.
The table also says nothing about incidence. Who bears the employer charge in the end is an economics question, and the honest short answer is that a lot of it comes out of the offer you get. What the money buys is a separate question again, and it is the one that decides whether a high rate is a bad deal: 56.5% in Paris and 60.2% in Brussels buy childcare, healthcare and leave that a US household pays for after tax. That comparison is childcare costs by country, parental leave by country, and the post on the true tax burden once healthcare is counted.
Run your own salary and household through two cities →
FAQ
What is employer cost?
Employer cost is your gross salary plus every mandatory contribution your employer pays on top of it. In Tallinn that is 33.8% of gross, so a EUR 130,000 contract costs the employer about EUR 173,940. In Austin it is 7.8%. None of it appears on your payslip.
Why do the two tax rates in this table differ by so much?
Because they divide by different numbers. Both rates count the same money going to the state. The left figure divides it by your contract salary; the right figure divides it by what the employer spent. A bigger denominator gives a smaller-looking rate, so a country with heavy employer charges moves less than the raw charge suggests. Finland is the clearest case: the employer pension leg alone is 17.1 points of gross and the two rates still sit 8.6 points apart.
Does the employee end up paying the employer side?
Most labour economists think the employee bears the bulk of it over time through a lower gross offer, which is why the total is worth knowing before you negotiate. That is a claim about incidence, and this page does not model it. What the table gives you is the statutory sticker price on both sides of the payslip, for the same salary and the same filer.
Does this cover self-employed and B2B contracts?
No. Every row here is an employee on a standard employment contract. Polish ryczalt, a German Freiberufler, a Dutch ZZP or an Irish limited company all carry their own schedules and have no employer side to add, so they cannot share a column with these rows. It is the most-requested thing the model does not do.
More country data
Figures come from cityparity's per-city engine, computed from official sources with a per-value audit trail; currency conversions use rates from 2026-08-18 and drift daily. Treat any single number as a strong estimate and run your own. See the methodology.